Where to begin? A little while ago I was feeling kind of frozen with the inability to come up with stuff worth writing about. Oh, what change a couple of weeks can bring…
I’m still frozen- since this stoopid polar vortex (those are rapidly becoming my two least favourite words) thing refuses to release us from its icy grip- but the words, they are a’ flowin’. New problem? I just can’t keep up with them all.
So many directions and so very many events of significance.. and yet I’ll have to just let a few of them go without more than a passing nod.
There’s this guy, though. And he deserves FAR more than a passing anything (except maybe an awed handshake or hug as I stand speechless at the greatness he embodied).
Strange that he’s actually gone. I can’t remember a world without his songs. They are such a part of the soundtrack of my life, it’s hard to separate out separate out specific tunes for mention. I’ve spent so very many summers by lakes here in Ontario, and every single one of them was accompanied by songs that Pete brought into our lives. Songs we could sing- vocal abilities or lack thereof notwithstanding- and songs that MEANT something.
He’s been so ubiquitous that I honestly can’t even decide which of his songs I heard first, or, really, which one I love best. Except… He adapted and then arranged words from one of my fave books from the OT, written by one of my fave characters from the OT. So, even if the tune itself remains most associated with some other very cool cats, I have to say that Turn, Turn, Turn is right up there in the cole-appreciates-Pete department.
Since I have so much floating around in my head and attempting to escape through my fingertips, I am not going to be able to even approach doing justice to the memory of such a pivotal character in our (popular) culture. There have been a lot of wonderful remembrances- in the mainstream media and here in the WP World- and I happened across this one at Shaunanagins yesterday. Yep, yep, yep and yep (seven times over). So well said. Most resonant with me, right now in this head space I have going on, is the whole ‘music isn’t just about entertainment’ thing. Pete taught us that. People like Neil Young, who I wrote about here, reminded us of that reality recently. It’s an easy thing to forget- when the throw-away pop that seems to be everywhere these days is the ‘music’ of first exposure for a whole lot of young people.
There are too few people, when you examine their lives, about whom you can honestly say that 94 (!) years wasn’t enough time here among us. Pete was one of those ‘voices’ I spoke about. And his is still out there carrying in ways that leave me entranced.
About that. The whole ‘Voices Carry’ thing. And my assertion, stemming from outrage, that we HAVE to be looking for dialectic rather than debate. And about the whole synchronicity element- and winds of change seemingly headed in my general direction.
It’s been quite a week. That radio show that I mentioned? It happened, and people are talking.
#NotYourAdjunctSidekick is generating discussion all over the place in the Twitterverse, and groups of contract/part time/adjunct academic faulty are banding together to raise their voices as one. Some of the stories are terrible- situations far more extreme and representative of the true systemic inequities than anything I ever experienced before I gave up on the system. There are stories popping up everywhere. Even if some of them- like the last speaker on The Current’s presentation of the issue- seem to be missing the point entirely, and using the discussion as yet another forum in which to bash the Humanities and deemphasize their importance in education (I’d like to continue to vehemently dispute that perspective by offering up an article, by Tom Nichols- a professor of national security affairs in the US- about the tendency to dismiss experts in the field due to the inability to use rationale and reason to examine all sides of an issue- and at least entertain the advice of those who know stuff about stuff before reacting emotionally and erroneously to any given topic).
All this talk of universities and teaching and communicating has my mind looping through all sorts of the topics that I’ve been thinking, and writing, about lately. I’m finding myself missing the classroom. This is an ever-present feeling- since I LOVED being a teacher- but talking about it over the last few days, and coming up with ideas and plans about affecting change have me realizing that it’s time to get back to the classroom. But all this talk of the university system and its institutionalized problems has also reinforced the reality that I might have to come up with my own concept of ‘classroom’.
So this is leading to more talking and more sorting things out. Some concepts are more appealing than others- so a few proposals/projects/blueprints need to be worked out in the next while.
I do know that the ‘classroom’ for me is not Toronto City Hall. Not at this time, anyway. The ‘how to be a candidate’ meeting was interesting and very informative. The City employees who organized and ran the thing did so with professionalism and respect- something that is seemingly lacking in many of the politicians with whom they are required to work. That is part of why it isn’t the venue for me.
As I sat in Karen Stintz’s seat in the council chamber, one of the organizers commented that the room was much more decorous and composed than is usually the case. It was a joke, but it’s also all too much the truth. There were a lot of people present at the meeting who were there in obvious search of change- and some of them spoke with passion and eloquence and without the narcissistic posturing of the people who usually sit in those seats. It gave me some hope that positive change may be possible. (There was at least one extremist crack-pot there (I’m not actually talking about ‘the mayor’, this time), of course, but the rest of those gathered chose to ignore his rantings and continue on with the business of actually learning something. Hope indeed.)
There’s a great article in this month’s Toronto Life about those who maintain some level of faith that Ford is the guy to remove the City from its current quagmire. They’re wrong, of course, but I now sort of understand why they might think that. The article highlighted this systemic problem we have with polarizing our opinions to the extreme.
Us vs. Them. It’s everywhere. And that has to change.
As I walked to the subway this morning there was just the barest hint of warmth in the brutal wind that has been screaming around the buildings in the downtown core this past while. Time for a change of season, paradigm, perspective and approach.
A time to build up, a time to break down
Or vice versa, as the case may be.